[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [leafnode-list] fetchnews fails to download bodies

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Timothy A. McDaniel wrote:

> > I don't care whether you write:
> >         return havepath && ... haveng;
> > or
> >         return (havepath && ... haveng);
> Well, if this random subscriber can contribute his own 3 pfennigs,
> *I* care.  I don't like the parentheses at all.  I'm not sure that any
> version of C required them; if there was one, it hasn't been required
> from 20 years.  As noted elsewhere, they are unnecessary.

I normally don't like parenthesis around a return expression. But
sometimes I make an exception for boolean expressions, so I might

   a = (b && c);

instead of just a = b && c;

Ditto for:

   return (b && c);

I just think it looks a bit clearer. Not that it's important.

***** Phil Hunt ***** 
"An unforseen issue has arisen with your computer. Don't worry your silly 
little head about what has gone wrong; here's a pretty animation of a 
paperclip to look at instead."
         -- Windows2007 error message

leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list