Re: [leafnode-list] local groups, use as archive

["Volker Apelt" <va@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19 Feb 2001 04:57:56 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:

>"Volker Apelt" <va@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The first step in switching to C++ is compiling the existing code 
>> with g++. That could improve the current implementation as well. 
>
>Happened a time back and resulted in some renamed symbols and fixed
>types, will happen again in irregular intervals.
>
>> You shouldn't work around "old" stl. They are either conforming
>> or not.  And nonconforming should be replaced with STLPort ... :-)
>
>Hum. How much will that bloat leafnode's source code? :-)

Why should it? STLPort is like any other (conforming)
stl implementation, with some additional debug options.

Are you against any stl or just STLPort ? 



-- 
Volker Apelt               Group of Prof. Dr. Ch. Griesinger
                           Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitaet
                           Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
va@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list