[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [leafnode-list] 2.08b: Unknown reply to XOVER command
Ralf Wildenhues <wildenhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The problem's somewhere else: quoting from
> $ make
> [ ... ]
> cd . && /bin/sh /usr/src/gcc/leafnode-2.0b8_ma9/missing --run autoheader
> /usr/bin/m4: configure.in: No such file or directory
> cd . \
> && CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h \
> /bin/sh ./config.status
> Note that it does not say: config.h is unchanged. Also note that while
> compiling b_sortnl, there is no 2nd declaration of socklen_t, after the
> quote above gcc complains about leafnode.h redefining it.
Euhm, regardless of what it says, config.log proves that configure
misdetected the pcre_exec API. That must never happen.
> Conclusion: after that, config.h does not represent the data collected
> by configure any more. My guess: he copied the source files not keeping
> the timestamps, config.h is empty or garbage.
I'd be rather careful with these guesses in the light of his
config.log. Of course, retrying that...
> Stroller: please unpack the source into a fresh directory and do nothing
> in it except a './configure && make'. Don't touch any files or copy
> them. Does the problem go away? Is m4 called?
..and making sure it's not compiled across NFS mounts, is still useful.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list