[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [leafnode-list] 2.08b: Unknown reply to XOVER command
Matthias Andree <ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> that configure has found that your PCRE has the old API (ll. 5080,
> 5090), but it still claims (l. 5107) that it's the new API. That's
> likely to be a bug in the ./configure stuff.
I reviewed config.log and your build log, and cannot match their
behaviour. Unlike stated above, the compile of this configure test
program fails (because we try to compile a program that fits the old
pcre_exec API), but failure means "new API", so "yes" is correct.
Still, at build time, filterutil.c fails the compile, so I must for now
assume that "missing" or strange file time patterns broke the compile. I
cannot find a bug in the build procedure at this time, and I'm falling
into line with Ralf's analysis.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list