Re: [leafnode-list] [2.0][PATCH] log objectionable Message-ID in

[Jeff Grossman <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

on 7/15/02 12:21 AM, Ralf Wildenhues at wildenhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> * Jeff Grossman wrote on Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:09:42AM CEST:
>> 
>> Thanks for the patch, but I am running 2.0b8_ma10pre3.3.
> 
> Against current snapshot (released shortly after your post):
> 
> --- leafnode-2.0-snapshot-20020715a/nntpd.orig.c    Mon Jul 15 09:07:06 2002
> +++ leafnode-2.0-snapshot-20020715a/nntpd.c    Mon Jul 15 09:13:16 2002
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@
> if (havemessageid) {
>    struct stat st;
> 
> +        ln_log(LNLOG_SDEBUG, LNLOG_CARTICLE, "debug Message-ID: %s", mid);
>    if (!validate_messageid(mid)) {
> nntpprintf("441 Invalid Message-ID: header, article not posted");
> log_unlink(inname, 0);
> 
> 
> 
> Against 2.0b8_ma10pre3.3:
> 
> --- leafnode-2.0b8_ma10pre3.3/nntpd.orig.c    Mon Jul 15 09:14:31 2002
> +++ leafnode-2.0b8_ma10pre3.3/nntpd.c    Mon Jul 15 09:13:21 2002
> @@ -1486,6 +1486,7 @@
> if (havemessageid) {
>    struct stat st;
> 
> +        ln_log(LNLOG_SDEBUG, LNLOG_CARTICLE, "debug Message-ID: %s", mid);
>    if (!validate_messageid(mid)) {
> nntpprintf("441 Invalid Message-ID: header, article not posted");
> log_unlink(inname);
> 
> 
> Note that these patches only output the Message-ID to the syslog if they
> were provided by the news reader (leafnode suggests a Message-ID), and
> with level LOG_DEBUG.  Note that if you pipe this post directly into
> patch, one of the hunks _will_ fail ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> Ralf

Thank you.  I will give it a try later tonight when I get home.  One quick
question.  I don't use patch much, what is the command to patch the above?

Thanks,
Jeff
-- 
Jeff Grossman (jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)


-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list