Re: [leafnode-list] Specfile changes

[Kenneth Porter <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 03:02, Matthias Andree wrote:

> I might better get rid of the - and put 2.0.0.alpha20020910a or
> something instead. That should satisfy RPM. Users that actually install
> may have to use rpm -Uhv --oldpackage to install a newer alpha when they
> update from a beta, but that's a minor annoyance.

I can live with that.

> This is what a "COMPILED" .spec file looks like now. I'd be interested
> if YOUR system compresses the man pages automatically (SuSE Linux 7.3
> does) or if I must do it manually.

The Red Hat build macros do that as well, and also strip the binaries.

> Release: 0

Might as well set this to 1, then, since "alpha" or "beta" is in the
Version.

> %define lockdir     /var/lock/news/fetchnews.lck
> %define lockfile    %{lockdir}/fetchnews.lck

Shouldn't the lockdir be just /var/lock/news?



-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list