[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9

To: leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
From: Kenneth Porter <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:28:36 -0700
In-reply-to: <3EA74248.BeroList-2.5.9@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Original-message-id: <404536382.1051129716@[10.69.3.69]>
Reply-to: leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--On Wednesday, April 23, 2003 9:47 PM -0400 William Hooper
<whooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, but as Matthias pointed out "SuSE 8.1 shipped developer and user
> space in the same pcre-3.9-120.rpm", so that fix isn't portable.

Has anyone filed this as a bug at SuSE? Or does SuSE do this with all packages
with developer components?

-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
  - From: Matthias Andree

References:
- Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
  - From: William Hooper

Prev by Date: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Next by Date: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Previous by thread: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Next by thread: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread