[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9

To: leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:58:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <3EA759EA.BeroList-2.5.9@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Mail-followup-to: leafnode-list@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de
Original-message-id: <20030424085845.GB4440@merlin.emma.line.org>
Reply-to: leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Kenneth Porter schrieb am 2003-04-23:

> --On Wednesday, April 23, 2003 9:47 PM -0400 William Hooper
> <whooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, but as Matthias pointed out "SuSE 8.1 shipped developer and user
> > space in the same pcre-3.9-120.rpm", so that fix isn't portable.
> 
> Has anyone filed this as a bug at SuSE? Or does SuSE do this with all packages
> with developer components?

It's a wish at best -- I'm not aware of a SuSE policy to always separate
user and developer packages.

-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list

References:
- Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
  - From: Kenneth Porter

Prev by Date: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Next by Date: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Previous by thread: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Next by thread: Re: [leafnode-list] Leafnode 1.9.38.rel and RHL 9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread