[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[leafnode-list] Re: broken articles

To: leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:57:11 +0200
Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:57:45 +0200
List-id: Discussions on the Leafnode Usenet software package <leafnode-list.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Sender: leafnode-list-bounces+list01=leafnode.de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Roi Dayan <roi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> what info you need ?
> binaries not completed, they just take a lot less for some reason from 
> original size.

What is in the intact copy of the article at the same place where the
leafnode copy breaks off?

-- 
Matthias Andree
-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/

Follow-Ups:
- [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
  - From: Roi Dayan

References:
- [leafnode-list] broken articles
  - From: Roi Dayan
- [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
  - From: Matthias Andree
- [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
  - From: Roi Dayan

Prev by Date: [leafnode-list] Re: Leafnode and runit/daemontools?
Next by Date: [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
Previous by thread: [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
Next by thread: [leafnode-list] Re: broken articles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread