[leafnode-list] Re: parallel connections to single server

[Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx>]

Thufir <hawat.thufir@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there a design or practicality reason for only having a single
> connection to a single server at any one time?

Yes, design reason - code is *MUST* easier that way.

> Seems it'd be more efficient to download group.one and group.two
> simultaneously.  Is this either a PITA to implement, or, perhaps,
> frowned upon?

The former is definitely true, or at least long-winded work (and the
local drive may become the bottleneck on slower drives with faster links
anyways), whether it's frowned upon depends on (a) whom you're asking,
(b) how many simultaneous connections to the same server you're talking
about.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/