[leafnode-list] Re: [beta] build process: dependency handling

[Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx>]

ino-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (clemens fischer) writes:

> On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:34:16 +0200 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> * clemens fischer wrote on Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:42:44PM CEST:
>> 
>>> only one of "expire_lookup.o" is needed, the extra won't hurt,
>>> but it doesn't help, either.  if it isn't edited in after the compiler
>>> run, the compiler would be at fault.
>> 
>> I don't quite follow.  Listing the same target twice isn't a bug.
>> Are you reporting a bug or is this just out of curiosity?
>
> i know it's not a bug as seen from gnu-make, but since the compiler
> makes the dependencies itself, i wonder why it does that.

This doesn't appear to have practical consequences for leafnode, right?
At least not on somewhat POSIX compliant systems.  

Could you please move this to the automake list and discuss there?

-- 
Matthias Andree
-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/