[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[leafnode-list] Re: Header PATH and FQDN
B0;256;0cOn 2010-12-06, Martin Brunzel wrote:
> Am Montag 06 Dezember 2010, 17:25:42 schrieb Adam Funk:
>> Upstream servers might regard the preloaded path as forged; some
>> servers move it to another X-Orig-Path header, which looks like
> Well, the "bullschitt" can be cleaned up quite well, depending on the
> surface. But there ain't no quick, clean and nice solution for the other
> wish, at least not in leafnode2.
> Yet, I will put this on a ToDo-list, and if there are no important
> reasons against some solution like this:
Let me clarify that I don't think this is a big deal! I was just
pointing out what I know about why the local Path header *might* be
undesirable for some people.
leafnode-list mailing list