[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[leafnode-list] Re: Header PATH and FQDN



B0;256;0cOn 2010-12-06, Martin Brunzel wrote:

> Am Montag 06 Dezember 2010, 17:25:42 schrieb Adam Funk:

>> Upstream servers might regard the preloaded path as forged; some
>> servers move it to another X-Orig-Path header, which looks like
>> "bullschitt".
>
> Well, the "bullschitt" can be cleaned up quite well, depending on the 
> surface. But there ain't no quick, clean and nice solution for the other 
> wish, at least not in leafnode2. 
>
> Yet, I will put this on a ToDo-list, and if there are no important 
> reasons against some solution like this:

Let me clarify that I don't think this is a big deal!  I was just
pointing out what I know about why the local Path header *might* be
undesirable for some people.

-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/