[leafnode-list] Re: leafnode installation on centos 6.5/webmin

[MatÄj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxx>]

On 2014-12-28, 22:14 GMT, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> That raises the question why we are still using xinetd. Mageia 
> is following Fedora and has systemd.  Installing leafnode
> pulls in xinetd.

For Leafnode 1 or Leafnode 2?

I guess just because nobody wrote the unit files.  Feel free to 
use mine from 
https://gitorious.org/leafnode-2/leafnode-2/merge_requests/3 
(and I hope Matthias merges them soon, so they would be 
available in the main repo; also notice, they are originally 
from Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/719749).

For the leafnode 1, I don't think it makes sense to change it 
I guess (I won't do it for leafnode 1.* on Fedora/RHEL), because 
leafnode 1.* should be probably left in the state of the deep 
maintenance state and not be touched much (unless provoked by 
bug or an security issue).

Best,

MatÄj

-- 
_______________________________________________
leafnode-list mailing list
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mailman/listinfo/leafnode-list
http://leafnode.sourceforge.net/