Re: [leafnode-list] leafnode 1 : Gnus 0

[krasel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Cornelius Krasel)]

Joerg Dietrich wrote:

> It'll should fix at least the latter problem.
> 	Cornelius, what about a 1.9.3? This is getting annoying!

I fully agree. However, I don't think it makes sense to release a 1.9.3
and a few weeks later release a 1.10 which is more rigorosely tested
already: I guess there are at least a few dozen people using 1.10b2
at the moment without much complaints - except the ones which I've
already posted to the list. I have thought to release the 1.10b2 as
stable, but have refrained from this since the "delaybody" apparently
doesn't work in there.

I am flying back to Wuerzburg from Glasgow today, so over the weekend
I hopefully will have some time to fix up the remaining bugs in the
1.10b2, making it a 1.10b3 :-)

--Cornelius.

-- 
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  SP4 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list