[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[leafnode-list] [Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <firstname.lastname@example.org>] BeroList 2.5.9 Code Quality Is A Disaster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Last Friday, Bernd Rosenkränzer, the author of BeroList, sent a response
to my BugTraq announcement, which I'm forwarding from BugTraq (some
Received: lines stripped, XRef and Lines stripped), so that his reponse
shows up in all places my post showed up.
I'm not attaching it since I fear BeroList might eat folded lines again
and might trash the boundary parameter.
(signature delimiter deliberately broken to allow display of mail below
even with "hidden signature" setting in mailer)
X-From-Line: bero@xxxxxxxxx Fri Mar 30 22:05:28 2001
Received: from mail.redhat.de (actually wg.redhat.de) by nx5.HRZ.Uni-Dortmund.DE
via smtp-def with SMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:25:11 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:23:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Matthias Andree <ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BeroList 2.5.9 Code Quality Is A Disaster
X-Subliminal-Message: Microsoft sucks! Update your system to Linux today!
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
> BEROLIST 2.5.9 IS A MAJOR RELIABILITY DISASTER.
I agree - the initial version was both the first piece of Linux (and
general Unix) code and the first piece of C code I wrote after converting
from the Atari ST + Pascal + GFA-Basic world.
I was a newbie at that time, and the code shows it.
The further releases were mostly hacks to keep it working for what I was
using it for. I've changed jobs 3 times since then, and I haven't been
running any mailing lists for some time.
If there will be a further version (uncertain at this time), it will be a
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5, an Emacs/PGP interface
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list