Re: [leafnode-list] [2.0][PATCH] log objectionable Message-ID in debugmode >= 1

[Ralf Wildenhues <wildenhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Jeff Grossman wrote on Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:09:42AM CEST:
>
> Thanks for the patch, but I am running 2.0b8_ma10pre3.3.

Against current snapshot (released shortly after your post):

--- leafnode-2.0-snapshot-20020715a/nntpd.orig.c	Mon Jul 15 09:07:06 2002
+++ leafnode-2.0-snapshot-20020715a/nntpd.c	Mon Jul 15 09:13:16 2002
@@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@
 	if (havemessageid) {
 	    struct stat st;
 
+	    ln_log(LNLOG_SDEBUG, LNLOG_CARTICLE, "debug Message-ID: %s", mid);
 	    if (!validate_messageid(mid)) {
 		nntpprintf("441 Invalid Message-ID: header, article not posted");
 		log_unlink(inname, 0);



Against 2.0b8_ma10pre3.3:

--- leafnode-2.0b8_ma10pre3.3/nntpd.orig.c	Mon Jul 15 09:14:31 2002
+++ leafnode-2.0b8_ma10pre3.3/nntpd.c	Mon Jul 15 09:13:21 2002
@@ -1486,6 +1486,7 @@
 	if (havemessageid) {
 	    struct stat st;
 
+	    ln_log(LNLOG_SDEBUG, LNLOG_CARTICLE, "debug Message-ID: %s", mid);
 	    if (!validate_messageid(mid)) {
 		nntpprintf("441 Invalid Message-ID: header, article not posted");
 		log_unlink(inname);


Note that these patches only output the Message-ID to the syslog if they
were provided by the news reader (leafnode suggests a Message-ID), and
with level LOG_DEBUG.  Note that if you pipe this post directly into
patch, one of the hunks _will_ fail ;-)

Regards,
Ralf

-- 
leafnode-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- mailing list for leafnode
To unsubscribe, send mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject to the list